She doesn’t like the way they need to make money busting people, the way they are tempted to steal cash from working people, they way they exploit customers to report on working girls to avoid problems in their own lives, and the way the system is set up to abuse everyone caught in the traps (mostly for money).

She thinks it is a big problem for “white people” that they show the world this kind of behavior, because the rest of the world respects Americans mostly, except for their young-acting stupid brute force efforts like this. She thinks we need to respect the rest of the world’s thousands of years of history a little bit.

She also says to note that working girls who risk public health and choose to “grab the money” at all cost are a problem and should be stopped. But she says it is really easy to stop them without tricking the regular working girls who actually care about their customers and their communities and just do what they have to do to survive and feed their kids, make a living, etc.

Religious teachings make it wrong. Your parent’s teachings make it wrong. Society teaching behavior controls make it wrong. Biology, however, does not think it wrong, does it? Jury is out on that, mostly because we can’t argue the point without the bias that comes from those other influences.

What happens in Asia? Obviously Asian working girls are not so different from their customers’ wives, right? Oh yes they are. A successful Asian working girl in Asia is clearly a member of a working girl class. She is obviously a working girl, and considered unworthy of “normal” respect.

If you want to really get crazy with your thinking, consider how Asian societies handle non-professional cheating, like affairs and wife swaps. What a mess! They don’t know what to do with all of that…and it is taking quite a toll on society (especially China).

I think every customer should think about their own behavior, and be responsible for their own actions. That is why a law enforcement officer going undercover to offer large cash incentives to working girls, seriously (professionally!) hoping they break the law for an opportunity to have money, is so wrong. When an officer does that he takes a very big hit on his respectability. What a low-life! And not very smart, because he is willing to push for a literal interpretation of written law at the expense of societal peace, comfort, and stability… the very same things he is sworn to protect. A working girl giving manual release is not only not a threat, but is a value to society. One of those who strays to accept a $300 cash bribe should not be imprisoned. If she got a large cash fine, she would stop accepting offers. Sadly, however, the police would start offering $500 instead of $300 and the problem would not go away.